Is the Pro Cycling Challenge already over? Ask Baldwin.

//Is the Pro Cycling Challenge already over? Ask Baldwin.

Is the Pro Cycling Challenge already over? Ask Baldwin.

Baldwin says game over.

Eleven seconds doesn’t sound like much but maybe it’s every thing, a deciding factor, an insurmountable barrier.

Talk to a cross section of cycling journalists and they will shake their heads and say yeah, US Pro Cycling Challenge done, congrats Levi. While a cycling writer as respected as Joe Lindsey warns us to hedge our bets, the general consensus is game over.

Two years ago HTC-Columbia’s Mick Rogers won the Tour of California by nine seconds over Dave Zabriskie. In the final stage Garmin threw everything they had at Rogers in the Agoura Hills. Didn’t change a thing or a second.

Bissell rider and Boulder, Colorado resident Chris Baldwin is also in the “GC decided” camp. “I think the race is over for GC. I knew it was gonna come down to the Vail time trial. I didn’t see the rain and the descent [of Independence Pass) being a factor — that was the only boomerang — but it’s over.”

Baldwin’s goal for what most normal people call the Tour of Colorado was a top 15 on GC. Right now he’s just three seconds away from fifteen and only Janier Acevedo of Gobernacion De Antioquia is in his way.

If he finds an opportunity somewhere on the road or a lucky time bonus falls his way, he’s nailed his objective. But as far as the race winner, Baldwin doubts Leipheimer will fail.

“Nobody is going to roll over. Garmin is not going to lay down. You’ll see a lot of action going into Breckenridge,” said Baldwin. “Swan mountain isn’t hard but it’s hard enough and then it’s a drag so it’s not going look like a sprint finish.”

But that doesn’t change his considered opinion on the first winner of the US Pro Cycling Challenge. “It’s over.”

By |2019-02-03T16:16:02-08:00August 26th, 2011|Uncategorized|4 Comments

About the Author:


  1. FanDeSoler August 27, 2011 at 7:28 am - Reply

    This race was destined to be a yawner from the get-go. Why they didn't take advantage of Colorado's seemingly infinite amounts of opportunities for summit finishes is beyond me. Or why not schedule the time-trial on the last stage for some suspense?

    This just shows to me how good the Tour of Utah was, and how easily it is to plan a bad route. Mountains does not necessarily equate a good race.

    • beth August 27, 2011 at 5:05 pm - Reply

      I was wondering that also. There have been some great mountains climbed, but the route each day hasn't had them "in the right place". I vaguely remember reading there a was a lot of back & forth about planning the route and choosing the starting & finishing towns. Decisions made were more about money & politics & not enough about the parcours. When I looked at the profile for each day's stage I was really puzzled that they didn't design the weekend stages better. Today's stage was quite a bit more exciting than it perhaps deserved to be. The riders made that happen, not the race organizers, IMHO.

      • TwistedSpoke August 27, 2011 at 9:52 pm

        To me the mistake was having the race end two days early in Vail. Then it's three sprint stages with no possible effect on GC. Matt

    • TwistedSpoke August 27, 2011 at 9:48 pm - Reply

      Well, I was disappoited that the GC race ended in Vail, with two stages to go. Everybody knew that and that was a letdown. Matt

Leave A Comment