Truth, Reconciliation and Luttenberger.

 

Peter the Doper.

If you needed yet another reason to support the idea of a Truth & Reconciliation Commission, that reason is Peter Luttenberger.

Today the Austrian, who rode for Rabobank in 1997 and 1998, denied allegations that he had used a blood centrifuge to check his blood values. He also insisted he never worked with team doctor Geert Leinders who is accused by Levi Leipheimer (among others) of running a Rabo doping program.

How many times this season do we want to read another story like Pete Luttenberger?Because if you don’t just let everybody come clean, then that’s what we’ll get. There will be old doping stories dredged up during Milan San Remo and Paris Roubaix and the Giro d’Italia and Tour de France. The winners of those races will not be truly celebrated because half the news will be yet another depressing Luttenberger-style tale of needles and blood bags.

Get all the poison out of the system by any means necessary. It sure beats the endless trickle of bad doping news that continues to scare away sponsors. Luttenberger stories are the reason why casual fans think pro cycling is still dope-infested.

If we really want pro cycling to move past the dark Armstrong years, we need a Truth & Reconciliation approach. As any public relations expert would tell you, transparency is the only way to go in this case.

You get two choices on how you want your ugly truth delivered: painful but quick or excruciating and endless. We vote for the first method — and so do the sponsors who are barely keeping the sport alive at this point.

Peter Luttenberger stories are the slow torture that keeps cycling in critical condition. The never-ending cycle of allegation, denial, recrimination, admission. It’s like a dope-fueled Ground Hog Day where we’re forced to relive again and again the lies and deceit from the past.

There are plenty of folks who say “let’s just talk about the future” — the fingers in ears approach. It’s the same turn the head, pretend it’s not happening attitude that allowed the doping culture to run rampant.

The past just doesn’t like to shut up. The only way you put the past back in the past is hearing the stories once and for all.

It’s Truth & Reconciliation now or years and years of Peter Luttenbergers.

 

 

 

Twitter Digg Delicious Stumbleupon Technorati Facebook Email
  • http://twitter.com/BoboFett3 Robert Olsen

    I’ll have to slightly disagree with you on this. Mainly your take on the look to the future crowd. We need to look to the future, while still acknowledging the dark past. Personally, and as you have stated previously, cycling is going in the right direction. But continually drudging up the past, as we have seen with Armstrong, is doing nothing but drive people away from the sport. I’m not saying bury our heads in the sand, but I think it is much more important to focus on doping right now than who doped in 2003.

    • http://www.atwistedspoke.com walshworld

      I’m all for a focus on doping now. A truth & Reconciliation commission doesn’t seem that hard to put together and I don’t see it detracting from anti-doping efforts in the here and now. Matt

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Theobald/1185398739 Larry Theobald

    My question to the “look to the future” crowd is…why? That’s the kind of thinking that allowed cycling to get into the mess it’s in now. Rob a bank. Say “look to the future. I won’t rob any more banks….but I’ll be keeping the money and not going to jail.” Does that work for you? Pro cycling’s going to face constant scandal and fleeing sponsors until all the dirty laundry has been aired and those responsible replaced.

    • http://www.atwistedspoke.com walshworld

      Larry, I love your rob a bank analogy. No, it doesn’t work for anybody except the bank robber with the really nice mansion in Austin or Santa Rosa or Greenville, South Caroline. Dirty laundry stinks more the longer you let it fester. Matt